

No, I mean their website.


No, I mean their website.


I dont know what that means. Do the oauth creds get shared with a third party or no?
The point is that most of these solutions require me letting an app post on my behalf. I don’t want that.


Surely there’s a more official link than X. Link to the source
Please log in to prove you’re not a bot


How does auth work?
Do I have to grant a third party permission to post to my account? Or do I have it auth with my credentials locally?


Don’t post screenshots of text. Link to the document


Because it’s a gift to corporations at the expense of taxpayers.
It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.
What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.
Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.


Unfortunately it’s not untrue. There are some exceptions to the law.
Either NSA got an exception or their code is public domain


Licensed CC0. Assholes.


Actually, it’s illegal for them to make software copyleft :(
We need to change that law :(


Just whisper gentoo in his ear


It helps to download content (like YouTube videos for PeerTube instances) when you’re rate limited


It helps with spam campaigns.


Did they even try to get the law changed?
That law has exemptions (eg for the USPS). If they put zero effort into asking legislators to permit the IRS to ensure that the tax payers money doesn’t just turn into a subsidy for corporations, they’re assholes.


Because it’s a gift to corporations at the expense of taxpayers.
It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.
What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.
Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.


Ugh, it’s licensed CC0 public domain. Assholes.


You could just avoid corporate media. There’s loads of great independent journalism in the West.


Don’t post screenshots of headlines


Sounds like they don’t know how to do security, then
Are the rest of their engineers so incompetent, or only their security department?
You’re doing it wrong. I want to run a macOS container on Linux