VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoCities Are Covering Flock Cameras With Trash Bagswww.404media.coexternal-linkmessage-square96linkfedilinkarrow-up1786arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1778arrow-down1external-linkCities Are Covering Flock Cameras With Trash Bagswww.404media.coVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square96linkfedilinkfile-text
Regretful cities aren’t sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.
minus-squarefrostysauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·13 hours agoIf you had read the article you’d know that the cities aren’t sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they’re covering them while working that out.
minus-squareCmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 hours agoI’m pretty sure one city did remove them and then Flock just came and put new ones up which is what lead to the trash bags.
minus-squareINHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·9 hours agoWe don’t do that here bro
minus-squareSeth Taylor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·8 hours agoWhy read all article when some article good enough? What am I? Some kind of readist? A phisosopher?
If you had read the article you’d know that the cities aren’t sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they’re covering them while working that out.
I’m pretty sure one city did remove them and then Flock just came and put new ones up which is what lead to the trash bags.
We don’t do that here bro
Why read all article when some article good enough?
What am I? Some kind of readist? A phisosopher?
READING FOR NERDS