Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGoogle Earth's new AI image generation function didn't survive a day after users deepfaked disasterswww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1465arrow-down16
arrow-up1459arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Earth's new AI image generation function didn't survive a day after users deepfaked disasterswww.businessinsider.comSome_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square53linkfedilink
minus-squareFireWire400@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoI guess by better I mostly mean “without AI”
minus-squareEnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoMachines should work. Humans should think.
minus-squarepemptago@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoSeems to imply people don’t use Ai to shortcut their thinking and people don’t think when they work.
minus-squareEnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day agoThe quote comes from long before this age of LLMs. We need robots (which do not spy on us) to wash our dishes and fold our laundry, freeing us to think and create.
minus-squarepemptago@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoGenerally agree, especially non-spying, but the context here is generative ai. So if I misunderstood the message, I’d be curious to know how.
I guess by better I mostly mean “without AI”
Machines should work. Humans should think.
Seems to imply people don’t use Ai to shortcut their thinking and people don’t think when they work.
The quote comes from long before this age of LLMs. We need robots (which do not spy on us) to wash our dishes and fold our laundry, freeing us to think and create.
Generally agree, especially non-spying, but the context here is generative ai. So if I misunderstood the message, I’d be curious to know how.