Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 年前Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square100linkfedilinkarrow-up1789arrow-down114cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1775arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 年前message-square100linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 年前Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 年前I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 年前But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
It would add to adds 🤣 @shalva97 @joe
I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0