A warning and a perspective from an insider who has been through this before.

  • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve never really understood the EEE argument here. XMPP was an open proptocol, Google embraced it and attracted users, then extended it and took those users away. But according to this article, Google didn’t extinguish XMPP. It’s still around and serving its niche community.

    That’s already the situation the fediverse is in. This is a niche community and there are already existing social media companies that the majority of internet users are on. If Facebook joins the fediverse, it brings billions of new users to the fediverse. If they then leave the fediverse, ActivityPub will still be here and all of us on the real fediverse will still be here, in a niche community. Everyone here has already chosen the fediverse despite it being a clunky, unpolished, niche network. How is EEE a relevant fear for the fediverse?

    • Ropianos@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, isn’t that sort of mentioned in the article?

      If fediverse development slows down e.g. because adoption of inofficial Facebook extensions takes time it will harm the whole platform. Not by directly taking away users but by blocking progress.

      I don’t think the Fediverse is small enough for this to be a serious concern. Especially once multiple companies (Tumblr?) are invested in the fediverse I don’t see this happening anymore.

      • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes I read that and explained why I don’t think its relevant. Facebook can’t slow down progress on the fediverse because:

        1. progress is already slow. The fediverse has been in development for 15 years and still is a clunky, niche network and likely will always be less polished than large corporate networks.
        2. Every developer on the fediverse is aware of the EEE playbook and next to none of them will try to remain compatible with any corporate extensions.
        • Ropianos@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago
          1. What do you mean? Progress is already slow so any additional slow down will seriously harm the fediverse precisely because of the limited resources IMHO.
          2. I’m not quite as optimistic as you but yeah, I don’t think it will be easy for Facebook and if they misjudge it they will end up making a competitor stronger by bringing more attention to it.
          • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            But #1 is predicated on #2. If developers are aware of the risk of EEE, then they won’t try to remain compatible with Meta extensions, which means development of the open AP ecosystem will continue at the same pace.

    • Rentlar@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s in the article but to paraphrase it:

      When a large company takes an open protocol, embraces it using adding users to the network through heir platform, then extends it using proprietary means, they have full control over how the protocol runs in the network.

      When the open standards are forced to make changes to be functional with the dominant proprietary app that is poorly (and sometimes incorrectly) documented, open source groups are constantly on the backfoot in order to maintain compatibility, and that makes it harder to compete on their own right.

      A second example given is LibreOffice, whose documents are made to fit the XML standard by Microsoft, but there are quirks in their documented standard that if you follow it too closely it isn’t formatted quite the same as the document produced in Microsoft Office, so they were pressured to effectively copy MS and deviate from the standards MS claims to follow.