• Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s fair to require disclosure. However, they don’t really go into much detail about what is considered AI. So for example, if I use Photoshop’s ‘content aware fill’ tool on a piece of artwork, would I need to disclose that the project used AI? What about if I simply upscale a piece of artwork that I drew? As tools involving some sort of machine learning become more common, it’s eventually going to just become a given that AI has been used at some point in a workflow.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So for example, if I use Photoshop’s ‘content aware fill’ tool on a piece of artwork, would I need to disclose that the project used AI?

      Let me predict the response:

      “Photoshop… oh, that’s just a standard piece of software! Everybody uses Photoshop!”

      “Stable Diffusion?! Commie open-source AI detected! OPEN REVOLT! TEY TAK ER JERBS!”

      Remember, it’s not about protecting the consumer from AI. It’s about the illusion that they are doing something about it.

    • 2tone@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very good point. I can imagine that they are currently just trying to prevent a deluge of fully AI generated content with this policy and will then adjust accordingly.

    • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my opinion, that more resembles a tool rather than a black box with minimal interaction, which is only good for spamming.