The monotheistic all powerful one.

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sounds like contradiction, yes, but it is just incorrect phrase. You do not have to be intolerant to be tolerant.

    The society have to be intolerant to intolerance to be stable, not to be tolerant or intolerant.

    • Bizarroland@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think you’re missing the point. The question is about a tolerant society.

      Regardless of if the society itself is stable, for the society to be tolerant it must be intolerant of the intolerant, and therefore a tolerant society must be intolerant.

      • Timwi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        By treating tolerance as a binary (it’s either completely present or completely absent) you’ve removed your argument very far from reality. The goal in reality is to be as tolerant as possible, and the most tolerant stable state simply has some (limited) amount of (very specific) intolerance in it.