so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

    • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      You should probably use fedora instead of debian testing.

      Fedora is intended to be used as a more up to date distro. While debian testing is just that. Testing

    • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Having used the same Testing install since early 2022, I’d say it’s not too bad. Stability-wise, I only have a major problem once a year.

      Eventually, you get tired of having to switch to Flatpaks while packages transition. I’ll either stay on Trixie when it goes to stable or reinstall. It’s still an ext4 system and I want something different, as stable as ext4 is. I’ve been using btrfs on my new laptop for about a month and have been happy.

      Honestly, in the age of Flatpaks, stable Debian is fine for most people in my opinion.

        • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          True; as said, this is Debian Testing. By “major issue”, I mean Grub occasionally gets borked and I have to chroot in and fix it, or the time_t_64 transition.

          I found the compromise between stability and newer packages acceptable for my desktop machine, which I am usually only on when I would actually have the time to debug these things. However, these days, I’m busy, thus may switch to stable in the next few months.