Hey everyone, I’m new to Lemmy and just starting to figure this site out. I mainly moved here because of the censorship on Reddit where they didn’t publish posts that included the slightest word not allowed by their filter and they removed/blocked lots of content. I wonder if it will be somewhat better here (on the official site it says “Censorship resistant - By hosting your own server, you can be in full control of your content.”).

The weird thing I saw with Lemmy was when I wanted to sign-up on the “lemmy.ml” server instance that according to the official Lemmy Servers listing page is a “A community of privacy and FOSS enthusiasts, run by Lemmy’s developers”.

So I thought I try that one when it’s from Lemmy’s own developers. When I wanted to sign-up it required an application that you needed to fill out with one of the requirements being having to copy a sentence from the link provided which links to some article called “The Principles of Communism” which I thought was very odd for a site to do. I’ve never seen a site like this promoting some ideology that directly where it’s part of the sign-up process to almost pledge to some political or religious ideology.

This seemed very sketchy to me. Does anyone know something about this?

  • teagrrl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Filters out conservatives pretty well and stops bots because it requires the user to read.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Interesting. Must be newish because that wasn’t a requirement when I signed up a few years back.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    The .ml admins (and devs of Lemmy the software) are from that crowd, basically. If you don’t like it, try another instance.

    Edit: .ml is for Marxist-Leninist, even. There’s no connection to Mali.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Mali is a Saharan country with low population, spotty, super expensive internet and unreliable power; I’d be surprised if the machines are literally there. And anyway, Dessalines has never mentioned being from a Malian background, but he does identify as ML.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Welcome. Admins and mods of every instance, not just ml are very trigger happy to enforce their opinion. Going as far as fully disabling users accounts. Not by using an automatic word filter though.

    Each instance has different political opinions you need to agree with. This one likes communism. Upside is no email verification required, so it is very private.

    Lemmy is much more wild west than moden Reddit. Similar to old Reddit. Enjoy the ride.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Main Lemmy devs are communist and aren’t shy to enforce their views, which gets reflected in their instance, lemmy.ml, which is considered to be fairly tankie.

    However, as Lemmy is federated, you can join any other instance and view whatever interests you without having to recite political literature to sign up.

    In fact, the most popular instance is actually lemmy.world, which is not politically affiliated; although it defederated from certain instances, which might make you feel limited. I found lemmy.today as a way to be connected with anything and everything, from Hexbear to Beehaw, to, well, Lemmy.world

    • Ambii [She/They]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Main Lemmy devs are communist and aren’t shy to enforce their views

      Their evil enforcement, our righteous peace keeping.

      In fact, the most popular instance is actually lemmy.world, which is not politically affiliated;

      Being “apolitical” just means they’re neoliberal. Which tbh sounds perfect for OP.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Nah, I take similar issue with liberals who scream about their views everywhere, asked or not, and do their best to turn Lemmy into a place where politics (and, especially, American politics, as if it’s a country with 99% of Earth’s population) is everywhere. If Lemmy.world would ask people to recite Adam Smith, I’d absolutely be pissed.

        For the record, I am communist, I just don’t want to be bombarded with politics at every corner and I refuse to analyze crochet through the prism of the class theory. It is possible to abstain from politics on .world, but it is often hard to escape on .ml (thankfully, Linux communities are generally neutral), or Hexbear (although it tries) or, Marx forbid, Lemmygrad, latter being a straight up shithole where politics is everything, people are as politically uniform as clones, and you can be banned for saying Stalin could be wrong in some of his decisions (I’m serious, it happened).

        People need to have a place to relax and unwind, and endless political circlejerk is not a good environment for that. Politics is important, but not really when people just proclaim the same things over and over again as a form of leisure.

        • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Nah, I take similar issue with liberals who scream about their views everywhere, asked or not, and do their best to turn Lemmy into a place where politics (and, especially, American politics, as if it’s a country with 99% of Earth’s population) is everywhere.

          I doubt that; otherwise you’d be screaming at everyone, all of the time. Politics are life, life is politics; ESPECIALLY if you’re not white-- this whole bullshit sounds like exactly why I don’t organize with white “leftists”; 'cause you ain’t no damn comrade of mine with a take like that. I don’t get to just “opt out”. I walk down the street, it’s side-eyes from settlers over the melanin in my skin, side-eyes from settlers over the coarseness of my hair, side-eyes from settlers over the size of my lips and nose, side-eyes from settlers over why I’m even in their space when I lived here half my fuckin life.

          I don’t get to opt out, so neither do fuckin you.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Well, believe it or not, I do take issue with this liberal pseudo-left everywhere. Big part of the reason I stopped following politics on Lemmy is because it’s mostly a uniform blob of liberals that consider themselves “the left”, and the actual left “tankies” and dangerous psycho radicals because most of their kin of “left” are American exceptionalists who really believe not being a fascist means you’re left now. And that took me a LOT of filter rules, not just unsubbing politics-related communities, to finally silence that shitflow.

            We all are victims of the current political situation - some more, some less. Even trans folks, which are probably under the heaviest of fires right now, often prefer NOT to immerse themselves in the political debates and news more than it is required to merely survive - and that’s totally understandable, because when politics hits you heavy every day, some people need to take a breather. Don’t deny them that.

            And me being white male doesn’t mean I’m free from any oppression. While you may experience more of it due to additional traits, such as you being black, that’s not alpha and omega of it, and the more we split, the less effective we are at uniting where we can and where it is equally if not more important - to fight for the working class. A black billionaire lives an infinitely better life than I do, and he does it by exploiting us all - white, black, male, female, nonbinary, cis and trans. That’s not to say racism isn’t real or some shit - a white billionaire would do even better - but there are many axis of oppression, and it’s not like you’re oppressed and I am not. Besides, I’m all for the demolition of racism, and while I could be less vigilant, I’m not much more tolerant to it.

            • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              There is no coming together with the settler when it is the settler in the way of my people’s liberation; and it’s frankly contemptuous that you think there somehow is. The state of race relations in this country is so positively abysmal that I would sooner put my faith in the Chinese than ever consider white Americans worth the time or effort expended. There is no ‘coming together’ with you and yours as long as we are unreparated and unliberated. You may as well just come out with it and say you feel you’re entitled to my camaraderie rather than trying to orate yourself around that particular elephant in the room; there’d be more dignity in it.

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                No, I’d rather say you have an extreme case of “race/gender over everything” mentality that permeates so many pretentiously left liberals among others.

                I’m not a “settler”, I live where I was born, and I never (at least knowingly) discriminated against anyone on the basis of race. You seem to suggest that I owe you something for other people, for the severe oppression of the black people back in the days neither of us was even born, and for the milder (although very real) forms of it permeating today to which I hold no relation. I don’t have to reparate you anything, and I refuse to give you some special status you seem to feel entitled to; but if someone actively discriminates black people (or hispanic, or even whites for that matter - that is a thing in certain societies, world doesn’t end outside America), I am willing to take the side of the oppressed, and more people could join black liberation movement if you yourself wouldn’t piss everyone off.

                If you, however, still want to be treated like a princess, I don’t need such camaraderie. You are either a comrade, an equal fighting alongside me (and me alongside you), or you’re not. And the most I can hope for is your realization that we have issues we both struggle with, and end this splintering of the left that makes us weak and useless, infighting over fighting our common enemy. At least the right are ready to unite, so…here we are. Enjoy the fruits of your personal liberation.

                • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  57 minutes ago

                  No, I’d rather say you have an extreme case of “race/gender over everything”

                  I’m not a “settler”,

                  You seem to suggest that I owe you something for other people,

                  to which I hold no relation.

                  I don’t have to reparate you anything,

                  If you, however, still want to be treated like a princess, I don’t need such camaraderie.

                  You really hit the settler-leftist bingo with this one, no free space necessary. Every last thing you’ve said reeks of uninvestigated white supremacy; and I’d suggest self-crit if I believed for a half a second in your bonafides.

                  That said, thank you for justifying why I put more faith in AES than white leftism, justifying why I consider there to be no revolutionary potential in the western settler, and justifying why I will only ever organize with Black formations. You, and everyone like you can’t even bear to cop to the thread of history which your story is sewn in, let alone figure out how to rectify that state. This is exactly why I have no time, faith, or camaraderie for the white ‘left’.

                  As usual, we’ll have to get it our own damn selves, with you people constantly in our way. What I get for discoursing with people John Brown would’ve turned into a speed loader.

                  https://readsettlers.org

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Good option! Could you please share the link to the list if you still have one?

  • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This wasn’t around when I joined. I suppose this serves two purposes:

    • Stop conservatives from joining the instance.

    • An additional filter to make it a bit harder for bots to make accounts.

    I think that’s killing two birds with one stone.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah when I joined IIRC I just had to write a sentence about why I wanted to join. The communism thing made me laugh though!

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you have an email address, you’re already used to the federated service pattern. When you sign up for a gmail, you’re making an account with Google to be able to send emails to anyone else with an email address. And there’s nothing stopping Google from making you fill out a “sketchy” application to get an account.

    On Lemmy, each instance has its own set of rules, and if you don’t like them, you just make an account on a different instance.

    As far as censorship, each “community” (analog to subreddit) lives on a certain instance and the rules of that instance apply.

    Edit: also on the topic of communism, however you feel about communism in the physical world is irrelevant when it comes to the digital world. Free and Open Source Software makes the world go 'round, and is often communist in nature, even if done unintentionally. The pattern of people developing software for their own purposes, and then sharing it freely with others is the purest form of “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.” That said, running an instance isn’t free, so make sure to kick your instance a few bucks if you appreciate their work.

    • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay but implying that a given instance is the main community for Lemmy by promoting that it’s run by Lemmy’s developers and then making people repeat phrases from the Communist Manifesto just to make an account ain’t exactly the best first impression to give, no?

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they’ve been trained to immediately recoil at the word “communism”, and don’t understand how federated moderation works, then yes, it’ll probably scare away a good number of users. But on the flip side it’s not a for-profit business trying to hook DAU using predatory and emotionally exploitative patterns, so who cares about first impressions? The people who use Lemmy know why they’re using it.

        • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not the context of the article, it’s the presumption of solemn affirmation as a requirement to entry that is agregious, no?

            • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, you’re discussing communism specifically. I have no beef with communism or any other political ideology. Except perhaps capitalism, I might have beef with that. Digressions aside, the ask could be for quoting an article about Spongebob Squarepants and I would have the same grievance. Can we discuss the action itself, without going into a discussion about communism?

              • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                24 hours ago

                If you don’t like SpongeBob, pick a different instance, that’s federation.

                To me this is like having a problem with the flags someone else has in their yard. Not your yard, not your flags. You’re free to not like their flags, but if your grievance is with the action of them peacefully demonstrating free speech, that’s a you problem.

                Sure, maybe that guy also happens to work at the flag factory down the street. Probably explains why he has so many flags. Doesn’t mean he’s going to make you put the same flags he likes in your yard.

                Edit: for the record, I’m not downvoting you, I think you’ve been very reasonable in this discussion

                • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  I appreciate you addressing the downvoting; I had noticed the trend and it’s very easy to jump to the “I’m under a personal attack” conclusion.

                  While I believe 107% that each instance owner can do what they want; if this given instance is the first instance to which most people will be introduced, being the closest thing to an “official” instance, should they have a duty, or at the very least, an interest, in maximizing the inclusitivity of their community?

              • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Ensure you aren’t a bot I guess, and if somebody programs the paste text they can switch the text to copy from?

  • juliebean@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    3 days ago

    it’s not sketchy, it’s basically a captcha to keep down automated bot sign ups, and they link to that document in particular, i assume, because the devs are marxists and figure folks who are vehemently anti-communist would refuse and thus keep down their moderation load.

  • starbrite@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Ikr? I’m honestly tempted to go back to reddit, but the privacy concerns ick me out

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    .ml is treated as a bit of a bogeyman around here - most of my interactions with their instance and users has been good. I realise this could be different for others. But, yes, they are Marxist-Leninist so, obviously, their opinions and content will be closely aligned with their political philosophy. In my personal opinion and experience .world seems to have vacuumed-up a tremendous amount of people from the other site you mentioned (Robbit?). Their netiquette seems to have not changed. Also, myself and some others have noticed that on .world it’s not unusual to see comments that express views from outside what the majority believe get deleted. Fortunately the “mod logs” are public record so you can see why comments were deleted, whom by and what the original post/comment was. (I guess with the exception of illegal content that has to be scrubbed) I hope you enjoy your time here. Welcome.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      (I guess with the exception of illegal content that has to be scrubbed)

      Correct. There is a “purge” feature, but I’ve not yet had to resort such measures after several months of admining.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank you (and your fellow admins) for all you do and the time you sacrifice. It is appreciated, by me at least. I don’t even want to consider what vile obscenity you run the risk of exposing yourselves to and I’m happy you’ve not yet had to purge anything; but there’s some sick individuals out there and I’m glad you’re a bulwark against that.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fediverse is not really about avoiding censorship as it is about providing choice. That means the choice to listen to who you want to listen to (i.e. what servers to (de)federate from/to), the choice to post whatever you want (but you might get banned from your own instance or any other instance, that’s their prerogative), the choice of administrators and moderators (i.e. which instance you sign up to and what communities you participate in).

    All of that stuff doesn’t really have to do with censorship directly, but it has implications for censorship. The fediverse is not built primarily to avoid censorship though, and in some cases it is made to make “censorship” (moderation) easier, rather than harder.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 days ago

    Welcome to the Fediverse! Somebody has probably told you this, but I just realized that I forgot to hit “Post” before I went to dinner. Here it is anyways.

    When I wanted to sign-up it required an application that you needed to fill out with one of the requirements being having to copy a sentence from the link provided which links to some article called “The Principles of Communism” which I thought was very odd for a site to do. I’ve never seen a site like this promoting some ideology that directly where it’s part of the sign-up process to almost pledge to some political or religious ideology.

    The applications and copying of a particular line is a simple form of spam prevention. The fact that the line is from “The Principles of Communism" is probably because the owners of that particular instance (who are also the main developers) are communist. I believe they also run Lemmygrad, which is full on Marxist, and one of the more commonly blocked instances. Lemmy.ml is intended to be a more mainstream instance but like much of the Fedi leans hard left.

    I mainly moved here because of the censorship on Reddit where they didn’t publish posts that included the slightest word not allowed by their filter and they removed/blocked lots of content. I wonder if it will be somewhat better here

    Lemmy is censorship resistant, but not censorship free. There is a difference. Censorship (or moderation, depending on your view point) happens at 3 levels, user, community, and instance. You can’t do much if other users find you obnoxious and decide to block you, but if you find the moderation of a community to be over bearing and if your current instance allows, you can create your own community from your current instance and mod it how you see fit within the guidelines of your instance. If you find your instance’s moderation to be overbearing, you can create your own instance and moderate it however you see fit. However, you will still be subject to the moderation policies of the communities (and their home instances) that you subscribe to.

    In the Fedi you have absolute freedom of speech, but nobody is required to give you a soapbox or megaphone and nobody is required to listen to you.

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    To their credit, I think the Principles of Communism thing is partially meant as a floodgate, since the devs really do believe in their project and want to avoid over-centralization from everyone defaulting to one instance. They know many people will go “What the hell? No!” and go somewhere else and that’s exactly the point. I’d be surprised if they really thought it would get almost anyone to engage with Marxism with the prompt, especially since you can copy the first sentence of the text and not read anything else (and even just reading it is not engaging with it). I think it’s more like a little joke.

    Also, copying a sentence of your choice to a pamphlet is not a pledge and I think it’s silly to view it that way. If it helps, iirc, one of the sentences that appears is “No.” and they will accept that as an answer.

    But assuming this was “promoting an ideology directly,” would you find it less sketchy for an instance to promote ideology indirectly? Because if you aren’t directly doing ideology, that just means you are indirectly doing it (sometimes very deliberately). Personally, I appreciate transparency.

    • _pi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think it’s very funny that a lot of people will post “omg communism boogeyman? is this legal???”, but they won’t do a very basic introspection of ideology and online community moderation which is at the core the entire intent here.

      Almost every lemmy instance has the same rule 1, those rules textually are often the same, those rules are often have the same meanings, but those rules are unevenly enforced between instances based on the ideology of that instance. That’s why you can be a transphobe on .world without actually getting the same amount of mod action going your way as if you were a transphobe on hexbear/lemmy.ml/lemmygrad/blahaj.

      Furthermore there’s sociopolitical drama between the instances like between blahaj and hexbear on what transphobia actually is and what level of irony is allowed.

      A lot of people interpret rule 1 as “don’t be mean” rather than “be mean in ways that aren’t racist/bigoted/sexist/transphobic/etc”. Which is why they often complain that certain communities they can’t post certain words, but user can dog pile them with community approved shitposting.

      And then there’s the lib instances who think that being mean to the Ukrainian war effort online is rule 1 and if not it’s rule no disinformatsiya.

      It’s like when Twitter had to clarify, you cannot call for violence unless it’s a call for violence that is part of the United States of America’s foreign policy, because Trump as POTUS called for violence over Twitter as part of US FP. But we gotta always put the the damn commies under the microscope for making us copypasta Marxist thought.

  • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Open source is inherently political and you depend on software being developed by communists. We are here to evade corporate censorship, censor reactionaries, spread agitprop, and discuss raising the quality of life of all working people.

    Not just tech workers. Everyone.