• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    While I agree in principle, a blanket enforcement seems like a great way for companies to purposely tank smaller entities just to get hold of their code/IP. Alongside this, it probably doesn’t help to just release the code, when these devices will run on web services, or perhaps even proprietary tech.

    In this case, it would be a great way to dissolve the company. Switch the endpoints over to a custodian project, have the servers owned and run through a community campaign, and open source the code and artifacts.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      In my ideal world, IP and copyright wouldn’t exist at all, but obviously that won’t happen in my lifetime.

      Neither would my suggestion of releasing any defunct software as GPL, sadly.

      The codebase the would be a great start, even if it previously ran on proprietary tech, having the codebase at least allows engineers to pull out the proprietary hooks and rebuild them to work with something open source.

      We need a right to repair but for software, sadly that also is a pipe dream in our current environment.

    • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Companies already tank smaller entities all the time just to have less competition. I don’t think OC’s suggestion could accelerate this in any way. They’re already going at full speed.