• luckystarr@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While you’re right, they have massive influence, but we have the moral high ground.

    The people we are close to, our friends, relatives, etc. will believe in us. That’s all we need, because this is the most sustainable growth there is.

    We don’t need to spew marketing propaganda. We just need to stand our ground and not endorse companies which will operate opposite of our values.

    • Zo0@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s too optimistic, even for me. Peoples’ perception will decide the fate of the technology. You might be able to influence a couple of friends and family but the general public is much much larger.

      Just take a look at what happened to cryptocurrency. It was an amazing and novel idea, decentrilizing money, cutting the banks, and the goverment from day to day transactions. It had it flaws but nothing that couldn’t be fixed with a few iterations. Nowadays ordinary people won’t touch it because it’s either for ‘illegal activities’, ‘scams’, or ‘gambling’.

      • luckystarr@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I might only be able to influence a few people, the act of defederating Meta will have the power to influence a lot of people to influence a lot of other people.

        Why would anyone want to recommend an App which can’t even interact with the most promising communication network in recent years?

        Federating with Meta will send the opposite message: “Yes, we endorse them. You can choose either us or them. Have fun.”

        I do not endorse them and I don’t want anybody I know of to think I do.