lebkuchen@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前GOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1450arrow-down13cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1447arrow-down1external-linkGOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comlebkuchen@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
minus-squaremesa@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down2·2 个月前Could we just…call everything AI then and it cant be regulated. Cause that would be hilarious.
minus-squareLodespawn@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 个月前Someone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.
minus-squareInitiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 个月前It’s funny but sad. Vague, selectively-enforcable laws are the point. We can’t just call something AI to prevent regulation. They can, though. With “laws” like this, the government can freely pick and choose who is punished and who is protected.
Could we just…call everything AI then and it cant be regulated. Cause that would be hilarious.
Someone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.
It’s funny but sad. Vague, selectively-enforcable laws are the point.
We can’t just call something AI to prevent regulation.
They can, though. With “laws” like this, the government can freely pick and choose who is punished and who is protected.