Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoSupreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up1525arrow-down15
arrow-up1520arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracyarstechnica.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·14 hours agoISPs already do that here in the states. The court case is to decide whether they should shut off access.
minus-squareHiTekRedNek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·39 minutes agoI can tell you that Mediacom cable will cut your service off for it, and you have to call in and get scolded before they turn it back on. And, if it happens 3 times, your service is disconnected permanently.
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 hours agoI believe ISPs do not want to cut people off. All that does is push you to a competitor. They want to be able to hold you liable for damages
minus-squareSabata@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoI got one then another, then got a VPN…
ISPs already do that here in the states. The court case is to decide whether they should shut off access.
I can tell you that Mediacom cable will cut your service off for it, and you have to call in and get scolded before they turn it back on.
And, if it happens 3 times, your service is disconnected permanently.
I believe ISPs do not want to cut people off. All that does is push you to a competitor. They want to be able to hold you liable for damages
I got one then another, then got a VPN…