• modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Years ago, when this policy was first being contemplated, someone at google plugged a number, likely larger than this, into a spreadsheet analyzing the cost/benefit of spying on their customers.

    This is just post-activation operating expense from their perspective.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Google made 100 billion last year.

      300 million is barely a blip.

      The fine should have been 30 billion.

      if the fines arent big enough to seriously hurt a company, Then the fines are not big enough to change their behavior.

      They just become a tax on evil.

      • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If you earn like 100k a year its like being slapped with a 300 $ fine just to put it into perspective.

      • glorptex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They should definitely be higher than what they are, even the GDPR fines are a joke, its likely added to a line “legal expenses” in their expenses.

        While it looks like the EU fines are ramping up over time, it still just feels silly right now. But I guess that is intentional.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Base it not off the entire company, base it off the value of doing this. They didnt make 100 billion off unapproved android user data collection.

        This argument is common and while fines should be higher, the idea that they dont matter unless they are 10% of earnings is ridiculous.

        • drhodl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Because all the “slap on the wrist” fines have worked so well to modify corporate rapism… /s

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah I’d agree that there is a lack of enforcement in some aspects but moreso a lack of regulation and legislation in others.

            There needs to be a better commitment to addressing trends in capitalism than reacting to their overstepping.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              These fines worked in 1957.

              They don’t work today.

              Its not an overreach to increase fines to a relative point commiserate with current earnings, so that they can actually harm a company and by doing so discourage future illicit behavior.

              To try and claim otherwise is some corpo rat bullshit.

              These fines come on the heels of willful behavior, that they believe they can make money off of even accounting for the fines… Which turns the fine into nothing more than a tax. With higher fines, that can destroy their profits and damage their company, they won’t be so eager to pencil evil into the expense line.

            • drhodl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I’m 70 years old and that still hasn’t happened. Bring back the guillotine, I say. Anything less is just the price of a permit.