• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now make the exact same meme but substitute “AI training” for “piracy” and watch the downvotes flow in.

      • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        In Canada it’s very hard to get into trouble for piracy unless you make a profit from your piracy.

        Or well…until these LLM showed up. That’s the part I take issue with.

    • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Because AI isn’t creating a copy of the original thing, it is attempted to replace the original thing for a profit. It would be like if a publishing company took some book, removed random parts of it then replaced them to parts from other books, then sold that instead of paying authors to write books.

    • Nelots@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is an interesting argument. I don’t think the two are completely analogous, and the whole thing falls apart once you go beyond consumer level usage due to piracy’s inability to make new things like AI can. While piracy isn’t going to get any game developers or musicians fired, AI image gen very likely will. The more it improves, the harder it will be for companies to continue justifying paying real artists.

      That said, you do make a good point that many pro-piracy arguments can be used all the same to be pro-AI image gen. At least at the individual consumer level.