At a random time, when nothing is happening, hand him a “paid talent release form”.

If you look up “talent release form” it’s what allows a creator to use materials with another person. As it stands now, he asked you to participate but did not have you sign a release (with no fee), so you own partial rights to income from that video.

Say to him: “Since you are a pretty big creator I assume you’re familiar with releases. I grabbed a standard one to give you rights to my previously included videos, and here’s another for any future videos including me for a 50% share. I’ll sign them after you approve and sign unless you have a standard set you would like to use”

This makes it a business transaction, vs a “leave me alone”. He won’t want to figure out how to pay you, so he’ll probably stop.

Yup, link is golden now.

Nice. Couple of things:

• The link in your post is broken 😉
• Consider doing with Jellyfin anything you’ve done with Plex. Plex is on it’s way out, especially with Fediverse users.

As a former photographer back when digital was starting to become the default, I wish I had thought of this.

My mother recently got one of the arm glucose monitors. Is there a good FOSS guide anywhere for them? (Unfortunately she’s on iPhone).

Those aren’t build logs. Those are “I took an open source software package and put commercial hardware around it.”

Which is fine, since it’s MIT software (and why I push for GPL, personally). What’s not fine is a creator calling their commercial product “open” or “DIY” without a BOM or build log.

I would revise the post title regardless of what the author calls it, personally.

I posted this as a comment on the creator’s post. Will have to see if they respond.

I see “open” in the title, but no git or Bill of Materials (BOM) links. Is this actually open? Or based on other’s open efforts?

Linux or Mac shop in the past 3 places.

And again their is an avenue that could be easily exploited.

And they lost all they’re credibility.

And those hosting it.

It can detect porn. They won’t be bribed on this one.

VaultWarden has contributors working on paid BitWarden features. For instance I’ve been following the LDAP PR for a while now. If they pull users away, they may have users who are unaware when those features release.

That being said, I won’t complain when for-profit companies based on FOSS support self-hosters. It’s good for the industry.

Edit:

This is why I won’t switch to it, though:

My homelab only has one home to phone, and it’s not someone else’s home.

Read what the new CEO says, and it doesn’t seem as bad. In the interview, he states that they’ll be adding AI with options, and since they’re not beholden to any one company, the user can choose what is best for them.

My guess: A sidebar chat you can disable, which allows you to pick your provider, and an about:config that let’s you customize the URL for local AI.

Would I rather time be devoted elsewhere? Yes. Would this be horrible? Nah.

That being said, I could be totally wrong.

The right sugar is the question to the poisoning answer.

Takeaway: Filevine sounds like a good company.

While true, what actually happened was interesting. Algorithm’s are not inherently bad, afterall.

At some point, someone wrote a rule to verify DSO against other tech companies, and trigger an automated short position to correct the market changed from an earnings call.

To me, that’s pretty cool. This wasn’t magic LLM AI, this was a smart engineer that programmed a system to discover problems as they arose.

Perhaps that’s backwards. Maybe women make batter CEOs, so AI parody of failure doesn’t apply as strictly.

You’re probably right, and that’s why it is in quotes, but I figured if I can save some people from reading a “there’s no readon this is 12 screens long” article I would.

FWIW I dont use Gmail at all anyway.

How to “opt out”:

• Open Gmail desktop in browser
• Settings icon
• View all settings
• General tab
• Unchecked Turn on smart features in Gmail, Chat, and Meet

Is there any plans for a data migration feature from Plausible?