You should add a rule against fake pedo porn.

I have contacted @lemmyposter212@fedinsfw.app, the admin, about the community. They’ve stated it doesn’t break the rules and won’t be removed.

!fauxbait@fedinsfw.app is for pictures of adult women who look like teenagers. The intended purpose of the community is for pedophiles to pretend to get off to pictures of kids.

And they have a pedophile community

Really? Must be a new feature, it didn’t when I tried it. I know they can execute code, I guess the engineers added a search tool. Regardless, that tool isn’t part of their fundamental design. It’s something they have to go and access, and most of the time they won’t. If you were to experiment by asking it to write a scientific paper, you’d find the references are garbage with broken links and nonexistent papers. Hallucinations. It’s just making something plausible sounding up, the same as a lazy human might.

if they actually could “think” wouldnt they factcheck themselves first before saying something

No. They don’t have access to the original training data, or to the internet. They’re stuck remembering it the same way a human remembers something: with neurons. They cannot search the dataset for you. The best they can do is remember and tell you.

I don’t think it has anything to do with paranoid delusions.

No, LLMs are not just an interface for accessing training data. If that were true, then their references would actually work. The fact that LLMs can hallucinate and make stuff up proves that they are not just accessing the training data. The ANN is generating new (often incorrect) information.

Their only condition was that they wanted to keep the Emperor. It was ridiculous of the Allies to demand a wholly conditional surrender. All those people got blown up just to win the argument about that one point. They could have ran a conventional air bombing campaign against tactical targets, but they decided to drop nukes on a “tactical” target in the middle of a huge city! And then they did it again! That’s not tactical, that’s strategic. If you’re going to use nukes, at least use them on a military base far away from cities.

Forcing people to give their picture to Peter Thiel is not regulation. Age verification laws are giving companies more licence to abuse users, not less.

Models aren’t programs.

So you’re saying that because the AI has been exposed to training data in the past, it’s incapable of making choices. Interesting argument. Pretty easy to reducto ad absurdum, though.

No human has ever deployed tactical nukes against a nuclear capable enemy.

The Japanese government was already willing to surrender.

The lady who spearheaded age verification in Australia is either the most useful idiot who ever lived or a lying snake. She talked about forcing us all to give our pictures to Peter Thiel like it was bringing the corporations to account.

The Matrix protocol sends the channel name and icon from server to user client. It’s one extra field to add the ordinality. Two extra fields to add the category and ordinality. Adding your idea onto My idea so users can also reorder channels after the space moderator orders them would be ideal, but please don’t mistake My suggestion for the idea you came up with.

Your group arrangement should either be under user account preferences, or local client settings

I disagree. On Discord, channels are sorted and grouped by the server admins. This is good UX design because it gives every user on a server the same experience of the channels, and doesn’t require users to all replicate a bunch of the same work.

What you’re proposing as a solution is that every single user in a Matrix space is responsible for sorting and grouping all of the channels in the space that they’ve joined. That’s a ridiculous proposal because 99% of users aren’t going to go to that ridiculous effort, they’re going to be happy with the default settings. I think your idea is better than Matrix’s current setup, but it’s far worse than Discord from a usability perspective.

I think that means people use Discord for twelve completely different things

Are you saying you want the moderators of a Discord server to decide whether users on the server use dark mode or light mode?

HTML and CSS are also protocols. But I think a better analogy is RSS. RSS carries information about the order of posts, which clients can use however they want. I think that’s the right way to do this feature.