Last I checked, you can have a system app as an accessability provider and be enabled by default

Pls replace with somthing like RSS!

Im sorry, this is stupud! Customers are saying, “this service is unsafe, i dont trust my data isnt being used against me!” And their response is, “Dont worry, we habe a 5 point plan to make shure we have the uptime of a waffle-house! Our product will be so easy to access and it will stay that way forever!”

I have a Kurig coffee maker (too little respect to spellcheck their name). It puts out a BLE beacon that I can receve a mile away. Its hard to know what that bugger is doing. G-force was right!

Yeah! The AI of apeture arent “real” but some are “real people”. Compramised is mabe a better metric.

Thats horrifying!

deleted by creator

Wdym by “backdoor into all Teslas”

• This could mean “taking an industry standard sorfware update feature and making it abusively aggressive to or push malware to end users”
• it could mean “grants tesla 25-75% of the car’s controls from the internet”
• it could mean the former AND “grants access to diagnostics, settings and controls the consumer cannot access themselves”
• it could also mean “can run arbitrary code on your tesla at any time with little or no notice”

Play a charicter specifically to get downvotes, even ASK or subtly imply you should.

Make a bot to downvote anything you dont explicitly upvote, but make upvote button un-downvote posts.

Who said button must corralate to intent? Dont dislike this post OP, i worked really hard on it!

In terms of vibes, firefox and brave give off the same queezy “we care about your privicy” half trueth. Read as uncharitably as possable, mozilla gives off a neglectful abusive father vibe where brave has a potential crypto scammer vibe. Being so jumpy about software as I am, following KISS and appearing to have less unknown background machinery is comforting. (caugh I hate “safe browsing” caugh) Firefox probably in reality fails to be properly privacy focused but sells the illusion effectively, and thats a bad thing. Also defaults are powerful and now switching costs are high for me.

The military is using a TEXT TRANSFORMER in it’s, “look at and shoot it” machine?

And less abusive, cant find it but there was a video on friend.com by the primagen. 😕

Exactly!

Anyone notice anything off in the promo video

Is the reason (Im assuming you ment) it can’t survive a repeater survive a repeater because it collects and recreates the particle? These cables are ment for logical data transport.

I agree. It leads to problems of its own.

deleted by creator

It’s a programing term that comes from the phrase “shooting yourself in the foot”. Come to think about it, a loaded gun is a great example of safety mechinisms.

Theres two ways of looking at safe systems,

• People are idiots and will get themselves hurt. The machine should prevent them to keep them safe at all costs.

Or

• without guardrails, people are vulnerable idiots and I am too. Let the machine prevent them until they understand and accept the risk.

As memtioned elsewhere in the thread, political pressure prevents implementation of safe systems. I absolutely love safeguards and being safe because foot guns are nasty. (Its why Rust is a great language.) but I will fight against things clearly created under the former philosophy because it locks people out of their own property. Because sometimes the “safety” is an excuse for controlling behavor.

deleted by creator