I’m going to assume the other person has that covered.
I’m filling mine with 4k baby shark music videos.
I’m going to assume the other person has that covered.
I’m filling mine with 4k baby shark music videos.
So we are agreed. Immobilize vehicles both when they are charging and refuelling.
What if hundreds of lives are lost due to broken cables snapped by morons driving away from chargers?
I can certainly understand why a passenger in an autonomous vehicle may feel threatened whatever the man was doing.
Being able to completely immobilize a vehicle while keeping it intact is a criminal’s wet dream.
It’s been a reality for over a decade.
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/
My point is that plugging in a charging cable is way down the list of attacker tools.
It’s not too big of a leap to imagine a world where a person could immobilize a car at a red light with the plug cut off from a public charger. Wall up to a stopped car, open the hatch (maybe it needs a pry bar) and put the dummy plug in.
Sounds like a lot of hassle. If they want to immoblise a self driving car they just stand in front of it.
Why carry a plug cut off from a public charger when you can just stab the tyres?
Use the pry bar to smash the window and open the door. Not open the charging port.
Fedora tipping doesn’t seem particularly aggressive.
She did have 3 boobs.
You don’t complain about having to open your door or start the engine when escaping a threat.
Having to unplug a cable during a very specific, imagined threat seems like a niche problem.
I think we need to know the average number of lendings for hardback vs ebook over a 2 year period. In theory, the library should be indifferent to the format being lent out and the costs should reflect that.
Borrow the hardback
The digital titles often come with a price tag that’s far higher than what consumers pay. While one hardcover copy of Cook’s latest novel costs the library $18, it costs $55 to lease a digital copy – a price that can’t be haggled with publishers.
And for that, the e-book expires after a limited time, usually after one or two years, or after 26 check outs, whichever comes first. While e-books purchased by consumers can last into perpetuity, libraries need to renew their leased e-material.
Totally agree with paying for recently written books. But are you cool with paying authors who have been dead for 69 years?
False, because someone paid that much for Twitter.
It was worth 44bn to it’s former owners.
Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions.
Yes, they don’t make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn’t mean they don’t do it.
In theory there would be no profits to distribute, but there would be control of direction via voting rights.
They may also sell the data.
I bet the NSA backdoor isn’t free.
Non profit == inflated costs
(Sometimes)
I feel YT users and creators are separate groups of people.
Tiktok has more overlap.
relies so much on user content
Does it? I mean, it hosts user content but it doesn’t really monetize that. YouTube relies on creators, and it pays them.
https://www.hendrik-erz.de/post/why-gzip-just-beat-a-large-language-model