NoLifeGaming

Simple. You punish zionists and democrats for backing genocide. If they keep losing on their positions then they’ll learn to work for your vote. That’s why always voting red or blue no matter what is bad. It just makes your vote worthless because you’ll vote for them no matter what.

Get this, they don’t allow that either. There are multiple clips from LTT talking about dumb things like this that Apple doesn’t allow

Apple needs to be regulated

This is dumb

I’m not so sure about the “it’ll be good” part. I’d like to imagine a world where people don’t have to work because everything is done by robots but in reality you’ll have some companies that will make trillions while everyone else will go hungry and become poor and homeless.

Can’t wait for wider adoption and further development so I can also experience wayland

I would agree with this.

War criminal

Hmm yes true capitalism. Shun those you can’t compete with

You see hamas has been there since thousands of years ago and has been trying to eliminate the jews /s

Oh wait it was a new creation in the last century, I wonder why…

Not a fan of tiktok content but I do see that it was banned obviously for censorship. A good move.

True, I remember talks about it being acquired by a US company but I think this really pushed it over the edge for them

I honestly don’t like tiktok but this is clearly done to censor the pro palestine content and for exposing the US gov along many others as hypocrites

Glad I’ve been slowly moving away from being google centric.

Keep digging yourself deeper and just citing some other philosopher as if they’re infallible instead of engaging with my arguments. If you have nothing to say of substance then stop wasting my time

Never said I was smarter than them. You must enjoy putting words in people’s mouths.

And you bud seem to like to run with the authority fallacy instead of deconstructing my argument and showing it as false. A beacon of intelligence.

I understand it very well but you seem to not understand that there is such a thing as syntactical garbage that means nothing. What you’ve done is gone and applied “all powerful” to mean the realization of possibilities which cannot exist. It seems like you really wanna push that definition upon people so you can claim God is paradoxical and thus ridiculous. But your position is just as ridiculous as someone saying that an apple can both exist and not exist at the same time.

saying “all powerful” is to say that a being can realize any possibility which can exist. A possibility which cannot exist is like a squared circle. The strawman is that all powerful means to realize even things which cannot exist. In this world there are things which are necessary existence. Meaning they cannot not exist. An example would be the statement “1+1=2” that statement cannot not exist and it is true in all possible worlds. Then you have possible existence such as someone eating an apple. There isn’t anything necessary about it and the person could have very well not eaten it or eaten something else. The apple itself isn’t a necessary existence. Finally, there is an impossible existence. Which would be something that cannot exist like a squared circle. A God which deletes himself or that can create a rock heavier than himself is an impossible existence as it would contradict the very definition we’ve given God. Which is the same as saying A and not A. Or that he can both be God and not God. Thus it is syntactical jargon like a squared circle.

A similar one would be can God create a rock so heavy he can’t lift it. The problem with these statements is that they’re not logically sound. As this would be akin to saying, can god be god and not be god at the same time? Which is contradiction and syntactical jargon. A simpler example is like someone saying they have a squared circle.