RaivoKulli

I’m gonna call it: lazyness

It’s not that special here but tar is a pretty good one

The post stresses the feature will be opt-in and that the user “is in control.”

Nothingburger

If you’re hosting stuff visible to the wider world and you don’t really know what you’re doing you might have a bad time. But also just going for it is how you learn.

Those relationship subs are majority women

Wtf is wrong with all your bodies if they’re that shit during your 30’s lol

Well they did want a different light

To me, X gon give it to ya

I think the current Indian government might actually go for that lol

I do find it funny how Reddit and especially IMDb is just filled to them brim with Indian content they apparently think I want to see

I think that’s a cool option for preparedness, but seems like a bit of a hassle compared to just using municipal water. But I’m guessing the municipal water is also fairly expensive where you live

I generally don’t chitchat with strangers. It doesn’t cost anything in that situation not to talk, there’s no negative to it.

But that’s not how it would go in a situation where you just don’t make conversation. Or are you thinking they really want to have a conversation with you and are just thinking “oh gosh I’m so bummed that random person didn’t talk to me”? I don’t understand

I wouldn’t gamble on someone else’s money since it is not my money to gamble on. It should be up to them imo.

It’s like gambling on someone else’s money. You could do nothing and the situation stays the same, or you could run the risk of losing their money. You feel the odds are good so you go for it, I would feel shit about losing their money just because I wanted to gamble so I don’t do it. And they can gamble on their own too if they want to, it’s not like by not gambling on their behalf you’re preventing them from gambling.

I never said I was doing this “because I wanted to gamble.” I’m doing this because I believe that the chances are quite good at having a positive outcome for both me, and the person I’m interacting with. I additionally believe that the chances of a negative outcome are exceptionally low.

You’re describing gambling…

I’m not ignoring possibility of good things. I just don’t think it’s worth gambling that there’s a negative outcome. If you don’t do anything it won’t cause anything negative and they’re still free ro talk to you. I just wouldn’t want to risk causing someones day to be shittier because I wanted to gamble.

I don’t want to make anyone’s day worse. Gambling on someone else’s feelings just seems icky to me.

So you’re just gambling on their feelings, did I understand that correctly?

Oh you mean UTC?

I knew this was due to DEI!