I dunno, it delegitimised the usefulness of Twitter somewhat. Now you can’t be certain that the NASA account that announces an apocalyptic asteroid is real or not.

Thank god for Karma.

YOU. You’re the reason I had to endure that unending two day borefest! /jk

So you see, Your Honour, we didn’t sell Facebook any data - we just sold Facebook the ability to harvest our users data directly.

I don’t use separate profiles (which I reckon are analogous to accounts) - but Firefox does have a feature called ‘Container tabs’ where you can isolate a sessions cookies into a container (default ones are labelled things like Shopping, Personal, Work, etc).

However, I think these are somewhat moot now as I think Firefox handles cookies differently in some way that went over my head - so I’m doing that thing where I post a semi incorrect answer to ensure someone shows up with the correct one.

Doesn’t Google fund Mozilla so it doesn’t get done for monopolising the market?

Besides Google’s intentions - the funding doesn’t influence how Firefox is developed.

Anecdotal experience is great.

I’ve never once come across a website that doesn’t work in Firefox and find Chrome and Edge significantly slower.

Presumably Facebook’s move into ActivityPub is to prevent or limit users moving to a decentralised alternative to Facebook?

Presumably Facebook’s move into ActivityPub is to prevent or limit users moving to a decentralised alternative to Facebook?

I mean, aren’t CEOs massive pay justified because they supposedly take on ultimate responsibility for the company?

If a company does something criminal under their watch, then even if they didn’t give the orders they have been criminally negligent - surely?

Now, mind, I don’t think that they should necessarily be the person punished most - the person’s down the chain more responsible should serve more time. But the person at the top shouldn’t get away free.

Regardless though I agree - fines with teeth are the most important thing.

I mean, aren’t CEOs massive pay justified because they supposedly take on ultimate responsibility for the company?

If a company does something criminal under their watch, then even if they didn’t give the orders they have been criminally negligent - surely?

Now, mind, I don’t think that they should necessarily be the person punished most - the person’s down the chain more responsible should serve more time. But the person at the top shouldn’t get away free.

Regardless though I agree - fines with teeth are the most important thing.

Not a vacuum salesman but repair man. Still active on reddit, but that’s the last AMA he did.

I doubt vacuums have changed that much in 4 years.