![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ea4c7d39-bb1c-4f59-b46b-c795c3ee0536.jpeg)
He was added as a mod pretty much for shits and giggles, he didn’t do any actual moderation. Still, he allowed the sub and many others like it, so very much the second option.
Known on another site as Gamiac.
He was added as a mod pretty much for shits and giggles, he didn’t do any actual moderation. Still, he allowed the sub and many others like it, so very much the second option.
I’m so bored of that line. At least come up with something different.
Explain Like I’m Steve “Jailbait” Huffman
Good. Lemmy communities need to be as instance-agnostic as possible.
Good. Is development of Lemmy still controlled by tankies?
Yep. Something needs to change if we want Lemmy to be something besides a place for Soviet simps to hide from criticism. Authoritarianism cannot be tolerated.
I’ve been spending my time both here and on Reddit recently, and I’ve honestly been enjoying it more here. Though I mostly lurk.
The existence of /r/Jailbait, /r/GreatApes, and /r/[N-slur] testify to this.
“Free speech” has become an anti-feature now due to the prevalence of people who use it to justify enabling bigotry. It’s sad.
It makes moving the default option for those using the app. Not bad.
I’ve been hanging around on /r/StreetFighter since the SF6 beta dropped, and I honestly just wish they’d freaking move to Lemmy already or something. I dunno what other forums even exist for the fighting game community at this point outside of Reddit :(
Yeah, people going “hurr durr the protests don’t matter” aren’t seeing the bigger picture. True, the protests were ineffective at best in changing Spez’s mind, but the thing they’re protesting will end up destroying Reddit because crippling mod tools is going to cause spam to explode on the platform.
Can’t you get banned from Threads? What happens when someone posts content on a Fediverse server that isn’t supposed to be allowed on Threads? Porn, for example.
What is there to think about? I complain about people who support Soviet-style dictatorships having full control over online platforms moderating exactly as one would expect, and I get told by Random Guy On The Internet #368,452 that I’m apparently a hypocrite because wanting action to be taken to stop authoritarians from controlling social networks makes me the real authoritarian or something. All this to “suit my agenda”, which in this case is wanting to be able to say that authoritarians are bad.
God forbid I find arguments like that incoherent and unworthy of taking seriously.