It still Should cost.
Renewable is far from free
It still Should cost.
Renewable is far from free
Breakthrough: they managed to fix that part of chatgpt that goes “as an AI language model…”
Nosw it’s unstoppable
I believe it’s mostly due to not having always hot water hookups available where laundry would be or not consistently having hot water always available. (as in on demand, from a large boiler that wouldn’t impact the remain of the hot water uses)
I think it’s everywhere but in the US the water comes already hot, in Europe the dishwasher heats it up from the regular cold water.
Funny enough I downloaded the reddit app this week and created an account again.
Unfortunately theres not enough niche content on lemmy.
But damn do I dislike that app. It consistently pushes me away. Maybe Sync app is the only thing keeping me on Lemmy.
The sea is very corrosive which destroys moving parts :(
Airship can land and take off from virtually any surface that allows that silly baloon to fit. Not just airports or air strips.
Kind of right but of course it’s not just a filter to make sure the right kind of people get funded.
But it is a bet that only matters if it pays 100 or 1000x. If it’s not paying that it’s as good as 0. That’s why, most of the times, vc money does not benefit the company, unless it manages to have that insane level of growth. It’s also frequently not in the best interest of the founder.
BYD and NIO are good examples. But you will never believe you to be proven wrong so I won’t waste my time looking for others.
If it’s a VTOL it whoudl also vertically take off and land,and replace helicopters.
Starlink website claims the cellular coverage won’t need special Equipment
Of course, there are all. Those. Chem trails
Unions will say that without the /s
In an interview Sam altman said "they realise the amount of money they needed would never come only from donations.
It’s still kind of a foundation, he mentioned it in the Lex Friedman podcast.
Worth something, not 20 bucks per user per month.
Só your solution is instead of charging the viewer charge who? The person that puts videos up?
Do you really think your anonymized user data is worth the 20 bucks/user the YouTube premium costs?
In your mind YouTube can just sell the data for the 2 billion users they have and instantly make 40 billion dollars a month from that?
Pretty sure your description sold YouTube family plan to a lot of people. I was ready to hate on it but after you describe that’s a pretty sweet deal.
“I’ve gotten this far, might as well go all the way through”
'“I need to live with my consequences of my decisions”
“it may turn out to be a mistake but It will be my mistake”
“if I didn’t want to follow through why did I even leave the sofa? Of course I must commit”
So… rule 34?