

How could speech violate IP law?


How could speech violate IP law?


Hubs/hubby are not aussi-exclusive.


That would be all the books.


So United stopped denying care?


Nah, it’s one of the right ones.


I mean, we should certainly take the time to learn our rights, but I wouldn’t say that it’s ridiculous to not remember everything contained in 40+ pages.


Realistically, it’s both.


Donald Trump holding government office in USA is wildly unconstitutional too.


Oh no! Anyway…


Where do their messages still say private? I’ve not seen that in years. The initialism “PM” seemed to get replaced by “DM” overnight. Also though, many of them didn’t lose privacy. Anyone, at the very least in USA, younger than the Patriot Act never had privacy to begin with.


It makes sense with the context in the article, but “triples that of 650 million” is a very strange way to say “almost 2 billion”.


My bad, apparently the word “responded” was all that stuck in my head from the first paragraph and my stupid brain incorrectly filled the blanks.


The article says that they were responding to a call about a snowball fight.


Can’t remote in until the machine has booted. OP wants to screengrab parts of the boot process.
They’re under the protection of the POTUS. Yes, they feel immune to consequences.


Illegal doesn’t stop them.


I originally saw it as somebody using 2 different symbols for the 2 different sounds that “th” can make. That at least makes sense. Simply replacing the letters with one character (one not on a standard keyboard, btw) regardless of which sound they make is just extra effort for the sake of it.


Yeah, was using vanilla arch before my desktop stopped working. My deck with a dock works, but discover was inadequate.
Linode has a $5/month option.