

That’s an awful lot of typing instead of just saying “I’m a lying liar who doesn’t know what he’s talking about. That’s why I offer no actual data - because the actual numbers destroy my entire argument.”
Just another Space Monkey


That’s an awful lot of typing instead of just saying “I’m a lying liar who doesn’t know what he’s talking about. That’s why I offer no actual data - because the actual numbers destroy my entire argument.”


That’s an “I have no idea what I’m talking about” if I ever heard one.
“Citation needed” IS polite. You claim it’s not polluting, so clearly you know the CO2 emissions numbers from SpaceX’s datacenters that are being run off direct-connect to natural gas generators. So, how about it? How “not polluting” are they?


It’s pretty insignificant
Citation needed. You’re just straight-up lying or clueless as to what’s actually going on.


The ecological damage is not made up.


ROFL.
Thanks for admitting you have no idea what you’re talking about. Again.


Thanks for admitting you haven’t got a legitimate argument.


I’m only using an over the top example to hopefully make my point more clear.
If that’s the only example available that illustrates the point, then you have not spent enough time thinking through your idea.
Do better.
You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.