Data privacy framework
Data privacy framework
The developer specifically released the light version because they acknowledged that it is not the same and you need to make the explicit choice of what you want to keep using
Probably. Sounds like something cops would do.
ACAB
I’d 100% pay for it if the pricing made any sense.
deleted by creator
How do you know anything about anything an LLM generates? Presumably if you’re the author you would recognize your own work?
By comparing it to the original work.
You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.
I think I’m good 👍
Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?
They’re probably just using CGNAT.
If skipping is blocked in the ad, the client must know it’s playing an ad somehow?
The server must have to send some metadata to the client telling when it’s running an ad because there are other things that need to happen client side during that like adjusting of the time or making the ad clickable
Wow congrats USA for doing something that makes sense before Canada.
Disclaimer this was a joke I’m not a lawyer and I have no idea if this would actually work… 😆
Life Pro Tip: Register an LLC to buy your steam games under. The LLC will never die and you can transfer ownership of the business entity while it retains control of the steam account.
Sorry to embarrass you OP but it’s actually spelled “hay.” “Hey,” is an informal greeting.
new sudo vulnerabilities? how exciting!
E: read the article, I guess that is part of the reason for the proposal. interesting
The self in this equation is you. You’re driving your self around. Full self driving 😉
Have you used Settings?