I’m clearly not the one here who has trouble understanding what they read
And because I don’t wish to continue this childish argument, you’re blocked
That’s not what I read
So, as I suspected: some copy editor juiced the headline to generate more clicks
Edit: thanks for the clarification
What was the point of highlighting that this individual was an immigrant? Why did the headline not simply state that a “worker” died at an Oklahoma poultry plant? Is the focus of the story the dangerous working conditions, or that this individual was an immigrant?
Perhaps it’s simply an attempt by the copy editor to twist the headline into something salacious enough to generate more clicks…
Dammit. Just bought a brand new M4 pro.
Gorgeous! Make sure to post all your good photos!
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
but the law is the law: just because you own something doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want with it.
it’s illegal to kill someone with a smartphone, too
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Ugh, seriously?