Right, it’s a new technology, its usage is being curated. Even once they release a publicly accessible application, it’ll be like going to the hammer renting store, you get to go there and use a hammer, for a fee sometimes, you cant bring the hammer home or own it, they regulate what you can work on with it, it can be overused and inaccessible while demand is high, they can discontinue access when they want.
And they can and do give more access to wealthier clients.
Everyone has access to the same tools
go make me something with Sora to see what kind of equal access you think you have
amazon is a marketplace, not a manufacturer
Its a common misconception, prices are never based on cost, its what people are willing to pay. Now, what people are willing to pay can be influenced by perceived costs, but thats pretty artificial too. The prices at a restaurant for example vary pretty wildly in profit margins. Pretty famously, sodas cost cents to make, but people are willing to pay orders of magnitude more.
They both always are. Companies make up the prices, and price increases. Predicting how much folks are willing to pay.
All these folks talking in work chats in encryption algorithms and riddles, if only a technology could make these words legible.
AI interacts with data thats already there, its not a data collector.
Make a law to power everything with green energy
claim the internet titan artificially inflates prices
All prices are artificial.
The profit margins for selling a game are pretty high when you dont have to make the game.
Ive never understood the dependence on Amazon. It’s not even a monopoly, I’ve never bought anything online that somewhere else didnt also offer the product, usually an online store specializing in that product.
How do subsidies=crash, and what are more effective emissions reductions solutions than renewable energy and electrifying transit?
Even if its not some altruistic reasons, they still are literally subsidizing this emissions reducing technology.
Tho they are also going pretty ham on subsidizing renewable energy too.
I want a top speed of 50, 100 mile range, single seater, and a price tag to match
Those bastards, subsidizing emissions reducing technologies.
EV battery production as it is currently practiced is terrible
Nah. Fossil fuel industry want people to think it is, and most people assume it is thinking there has to be a catch. Lithium “mining” is pretty low impact compared to traditional metal mining, and theres not that much lithium per battery anyway.
it’s actually a pretty simple to figure out carbon footprint for gas powered cars. Gasoline is just a bunch of carbon atoms loosely linked together. You add heat, you add oxygen, and the carbon molecule bonds break in favor of bonding with oxygen to form carbon dioxide/monoxide, and release energy in the process. That’s how combustion works. None of the carbon is destroyed in the process, all of the gasoline just gets converted into a gas; a greenhouse gas. Its why cars are the largest source of emissions in the US.
All of that is cut in an EV. With renewable energy sources there doesnt have to be any greenhouse emissions with EV’s.
It says it a few times about x86 being decades old…but so is ARM? I dont know whats supposed to be game changing about it.
more specifically for the goal of this law, to reduce impaired driving, there’s the insane zoning requirements of minimum parking for bars of all places. Other countries have less drunk driving than us because they enable transit that doesnt require you to drive, rather than just trying to forbid drunk driving with no other alternatives.
Aviation and marine vehicles are both flying, just in different fluids.