

This is the most correct reply to this article that I’ve seen so far


This is the most correct reply to this article that I’ve seen so far


You’re probably just out of date. I had some issues recently on Waterfox, realized I was running a not-super-new version, and things worked great after I updated the flatpak.


Oh yeah it 100% explodes your token usage by establishing a contentious paradigm. But that’s what the C-suites want, and they don’t understand (or care to understand) the subtleties of how this development methodology works. So we’ll all (somewhat maliciously) follow orders until they change their minds when they see the absolutely ludicrous LLM bill 🤪


Now ask it why it’s apologizing


The best sort of methodology I’ve found to coerce Claude or whatever (we are strongly encouraged to use it, because you know, tech these days) is (for a single agent) to define a process that includes proving its work and citing sources. For agentic flow, you basically just assign a contrarian role in particular domains to some of the agents - ideally all of this is also hooked into an MCP server that includes deterministic utilities to improve accuracy and solution arrival speed.
It’s basically just a shitty, brute-forced, massively over complicated Monte Carlo algorithm that’s wildly inefficient in terms of energy usage and infrastructural cost, that also happens to be turning our economy into a highly flammable house of cards.
Can you tell what my opinion of all this bullshit is, despite knowing how to do all of this crap reasonably well? 😛


Exactly: the numbers that are being cited by the companies which have a vested interest in pumping up LLM usage stats, even if it’s just the appearance thereof, are - surprise, surprise - fundamentally biased. And of course, the spineless fuckwit generation of journalists that most of the populace uncritically relies upon fail to dig any deeper than the first-order patterns in the data, or to point out the likely obvious biases.
This is not hard-hitting journalism. This is the appearance of hard-hitting journalism.


lol ok, I’m sorry, hold the fucking phone - how do you break recycle bin…?


Serious answer: technical inertia and legacy reasons and most people don’t want to bother migrating established projects.


I have, in the several years I’ve been here, deleted only a handful of comments - pretty much exclusively as a result of me being in a terrible mood and/or too drunk and commenting something very stupid or dickish, then reading it the next morning and going “what the fuck was I doing 🤦♂️”. That is thankfully vanishingly rare for me lol


Me too, go ahead - it doesn’t matter.
What matters is when people scan your post history and check why you were downvoted, given the context of the comment. The community here is smaller, so if you post consistently, you can actually build a meaningful organic reputation (that is: other user’s opinions of you). Karma doesn’t matter. What you post, and how you engage with other users does.


I’m just giving a list of people that the article alluded to but did not include. I was able to find this with a single web search. I’m not claiming to have done a deep dive to dig everything up. Figured people would be interested to see the attendees / members list.


I see your em-dash, sales pitch LLM bot. Fuck all the way off.


AI is going to kill the enthusiast PC hardware community even more than it was before. Great. Love it. Super fantastic. 😑


I was able to find the raw data surprisingly quickly


Yeah I think I’m gonna block OP tbh, it’s getting really irritating


More or less, yeah.
And the same takeaway can be applied to American (and, I presume, a lot of other countries) politics.


Well that’s good news, at least.
And honestly, that was such a stupid fucking hill for him to want to die on - and he wants to die on a whole fucking lot of stupid hills.


Honestly though, the Russians do it this way specifically because it’s a deniable operation, and even if they’re caught, the criminal prosecution can be a nightmare.
So, idk; maybe if they’re caught sabotaging critical infrastructure of sovereign nations that happen to be in international waters, and intentionally setting things up so that it’s infeasible or impossible to successfully prosecute… don’t bother with the prosecution, go a bit old-school, and let the crew and the vessel plead their case with Davey Jones. Yes, it’s admittedly an extremely harsh approach… but, you know, fuck around and find out. If normal channels are intentionally made impossible to pursue, abnormal channels become the only real recourse.
Civilized societies need to understand that there are people and nations that will intentionally exploit the ambiguities that exist on the fringes of said civilizations, and sometimes, violent response is the optimal solution. And it doesn’t have to be “from here on out” - it just has to be done a few times in particularly egregious situations that are going to become a legal quagmire. It’s analogous to a bully who beats you up constantly, and then one day you snap and bring a monkey wrench in your backpack and break his kneecaps. He’s not gonna beat you up anymore after that.
Edit: and, compared to the idiotic bullshit we’re doing in the Caribbean right now, I’d feel a lot less bad if we sent a couple sabotage-oriented Russian shadow fleet vessels to the ocean floor instead.


that’s gonna be a “nope” from me, dawg.
So like… genuine question: what do you propose they do? Operate at a loss indefinitely? Go into an industry they have zero experience and domain knowledge in and just “build a factory”? And industry, I should add, that is probably the single most complicated and technically - as well as capex - intensive industry that humans have thus far derived? What’s the play here? Drive themselves to bankruptcy out of altruism?