i did

Yes, it can become part of one’s culture to appreciate another’s culture.

I thought by adding “or whatever it’s called” would make it clear that I’m aware that the theory is a racist and antijewish lie, but I guess that was not enough. How should I have worded that differently?

What would it mean to take the time and effort to learn to play the Erhu, understand its history and context, but somehow not show real respect for it? I am asking because the first two things seem very measurable and observable things one can do, but the last one sounds like something that critics can decide arbitrarily however it suits them.

Christianity doesn’t strike me as especially white. Not in the way that other religions strike me as being not-white. I can name some excellent musicians who are white muslims, but it’s still very unusual. In contrast, Christianity is very popular among very many races. Like, if you’re from south america, mexico, central or southern africa, china, russia, the philippines, and many other places too, you’re very likely christian. I suppose I don’t encounter many indian or arabic christians, but they aren’t terribly rare either.

One reason I think there might be no “white culture” per se is that things that white people invent tend to spread to other people, and become part of their cultures. Like, most people I know in real life who play classical (i.e. classical western) music on piano are asian, for instance. I’ve never once seen a white person say, “you can’t play that, because you’re not white. That’s offensive.” In contrast, I could imagine a white person playing an erhu might be told off.

If white people were defensive of their culture, that might change. Perhaps if the great replacement theory or whatever it’s called gets taken seriously, it’d be different. (Edit: by this I mean, if those white nationalist conspiracy theorists actually think that white people are going to be erased by other cultures then they’d act in such a way. But since they don’t seem to be, it seems like it’s clear they’re not only racist but also full of shit.)

I have never really considered Irish food before. (and I’m part Irish.)

I’m not technically white, and I’m Canadian which is only technically “American,” but – close enough. IMO, it’s mostly people who are not white americans that define to me what white american culture. Like, if you were to ask me “is this part of your culture?” for various things, I would say “yes” to many things and “no” to many things.

But many of the things that I would say “yes” to, other people might inform me, “no, that’s not part of your culture.” Jazz, Super Mario bros., rap music, anime, chickpea stew, spaghetti – I identify these as elements of my culture, or at least my “idioculture” as it were, but people have told me these are not part of my culture.

I think maybe let’s stop gatekeeping culture so much and let people live how they like to live. If somebody likes wearing a yukata as a houserobe and they’re not japanese, is there really a problem? It’s not like they’re pretending to be japanese.

I gotta spend less time on lemmy

yeah but it’s been aaages, I forgot about what happened in those. I remember it was good.

I love Jericho. On my third watch right now actually. Would agree that it’s frequently cliché, but overall I’d say it’s very good. Skeet Ulrich is transfixing.

I do browse. I agree with them on many political issues, and yet I can’t seem to get along with any of them. Why does it seem like they are all such assholes?

You’ve explained your personal opinion, and while I think it’s a sensible opinion, I was asking about the universal opinion on AI. And I don’t think there is a consensus that it’s bad. Like I don’t even understand how that’s controversial – everywhere you look, people are talking about AI in broadly mixed terms.

I think you’re mistaken – there are a large number of people who vehemently dislike it, why is probably why you think that.

You do realize the root of this thread was this question, right?

why do you say AI is a universally regarded negative?

In the early 20th century, Nazism was not a universally regarded negative.

Someone else ITT confirmed this works in Australia.

I am aware of a lot of people who are very gung-ho about AI. I don’t know if anybody has actually tried to make a comprehensive survey about people’s disposition toward AI. I wouldn’t expect Lemmy to be representative.

why do you say AI is a universally regarded negative?

Edit: if you’re going to downvote me, can you explain why? I am not saying AI is a good thing here. I’m just asking for evidence that it’s universally disliked, i.e. there aren’t a lot of fans. It seems there are lots of people coming to the defense of AI in this thread, so it clearly isn’t universally disliked.

Here’s a poignant example IMO:

For sure, AI can reproduce wholesale verbatim copies of text from miscellaneous sources. It can also create images that are so close to random deviantartists’ images that it’s undeniably plagiaristic. I expect this bug will be worked out eventually, but it is currently quite capable of doing this. In other words, you could say the weights contain a lossy encoding of many artists’ works, and those works can (lossily) be eked out of the model with some coercion.

By “use” I actually meant “reproduce portions of” and “make derivative works of”

Can the rest of us please use copyrighted material without permission?