Definitely !longevity@mander.xyz and (ironically) !cryonics@lemmy.world. This is literally a matter of life and death!

Also for the language !esperanto@sopuli.xyz and my home country !slovakia@sopuli.xyz, but revival there is already kind of happening.

Next good reason to leave from there 👍

GIMP

I would rather suggest to gift apples.

Close. Esperanto speaker ☺️

Sincerely, what one can attend expect from such closed company…

Second hand trauma unlocked 😬

What would world do without furries? ☺️

Cool. Make sense. Sounds like a principle similar to !EffectiveAltruism@chirp.social.

Btw, current cryopreservation organizations (preferably nonprofit foundations rather then companies) have learnt from past mistakes. Eg Tomorrow Biostasis requires quite a big payment upfront that is invested in low risk way that is expected to provide profit at least 1% above inflation, and the profit is used to pay for maintaining the preservation and later for revival and reintegration into society. It is designed to be long term sustainable to prevent disposals.

As I see it, it is not a one direction transaction. Your dog give your their part, you did same. Would you get your beloved dog more health if you could? (I get it that not everyone can do it. But if that would not be an issue?)

But, ultimately, it is your decision.

Can you elaborate a bit, please?

Well, first of all I see you love your dog and deeply care about 🤗 This is a kind of decision that no one should be forced to face. But nature forces us so…

When it comes to end of life decision, it is possible to cryopreserve your dog, so in the future, when veterinary medicine advances a lot, they could reanimate your dog and provide many, many more years of healthy life. All the thing about reanimation is still speculative currently (unless your pet is a small worm C. Elegans…). If you are interested, you may search CryoPets and Tomorrow Biostasis. Best luck 🤗

Then catgirl ears are enough 😉

Inspiration for many more governments!

I have already contacted my, Slovakian government. I should ping them again 😅

Or get a catgirl ears. And safer memory.

Nice thing would be to have a structured way to clearly present differences between communities of same name. Eg. possibility to link (in machine readable way) in sidebar to other communities and mark them as pure duplicates, or state the actual difference. This information could show also in search and crosspoting dialog.

Technically yes. The problem would be how to decide which community put in spotlight and which in grey (or any other meaningful distinction). Would it be automatic (if yes, how to decide the algorithm), or manual (if yes, how to decide how to left them). These things can be discussed out and solved, but we should be aware that these questions are here.

And it would work only for real duplicates of communities, not healthy separated communities based on actual, conscious and cherished differences.

In fact, there is a problem of asymmetry of difficulty. It is much easier to start a new community, that dealing with existence of several separated communities. Especially as social solutions (eg in case that the communities are really about the same thing in the same way, asking all members to switch, so for newcomers it is easy to know which one is active and maintained).

Technically, I agree.

Practically, I myself have experienced several fragmented communities about the same topic with similar ethos. This was not a healthy separation based on different norms. It was simple, ineffective fragmentation. Or, at least the ethos and norms differences wasn’t clear.

I don’t know with whom you interact in Mastodon, but this in definitely not my experience there.