“With great claims come great responsibility”
That guy from Spiderman, probably
“With great claims come great responsibility”
That guy from Spiderman, probably
Damn right I don’t.
Yarrrrrrr
Go away, Sam Altman
In my book WSL and VM share the same downside in that you’re only abstracting Linux functionality in relation to the hardware.
Linux really shines when it has full access to the actual hardware as opposed to asking it’s environment nicely if it’s allowed to do something.
For example, I routinely need to change my IP address to talk to specific networks and network hosts, but having to step over the virtualisation or interpretation layer to do so is just another step, thus removing the advantage of running linux in the first place.
Sure, VMs and dual booting have their uses, but the same uses can be serviced by an actual linux install while also being infinitely more powerful.
I played around with WSL for a while, but you notice really quickly that it is not the real thing. I’ve used virtual box for some use cases, but that too feels limiting ad all of the hardware you want to fully control is only abstracted.
I would say that unless he has a really good reason why he wouldn’t want to go for dual boot, then he should do just that.
This is why all those women chose the bear
Because right wingers spent the past ten years repackaged the fear mongering about “The Gay Agenda” and call it woke instead.
Game: Day of the Tentacle
Book: Cryptonomicon
TV: BoJack horseman
Movie: The Matrix or The Prestige
Honorable mention: Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog
I’ve been there a bunch. It’s a bit expensive and peopley, but It’s OK*
*: This opinion was 100% based on the fact that I’ve only visited the Charles de Gaulle “suburb”
By promoting the distros that have this as a goal, such as Mint.
I would suggest Ubuntu in this category, but… eww…
What is this? A gif for ants?
Pretty much when you posted that, I found this in my dmesg:
[ 715.744332] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6: Interrupt Throttling Rate (ints/sec) set to dynamic conservative mode
[ 715.965683] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6: The NVM Checksum Is Not Valid
[ 716.008541] e1000e: probe of 0000:00:1f.6 failed with error -5
Just for the record, I compared modinfo up against lspci, and the PCI ID matches, so the driver should work. Is it possible to ignore the NVM checksum and try anyway? Because any tool I can find that communicates with the EEPROM on a hardware level is made for msdos.
Derp, I don’t think I ever did a modprobe. Anyway, I did an rmmod as I found out that there’s a newer version out, and I’m currently working on building the new version.
UPDATE: Newer version built, installed, and loaded.
I’d be out of a job too
vmlinuz
I’m european, is Whataburger and a Shiner Boch exotic? Or brisket at golden coral with authentic Galvestonian chlorine water to drink?
It’ll be fine. Things have a tendency of working themselves out.
And if someone hates you for it, that’s on them and not you.
Also, let us know how it went!
Henry Fucking War Crimes Kissinger
He lived a long life and died peacefully, thinking he got away with it all. That only means bringing him back for punishment would be the perfect surprise of an afterlifetime.
“By playing doctor”
Yeah, that’s the guy, I think.