How many poor people flew on the Lolita express?

Turns out the only poor people on that plane were the victims.

Corporations make an addictive and dangerous substance so it is obviously the fault of addicted individuals

Wait, so the government/ military industrial complex is behind this website? Lol okay

Not long ago Walmart got fined by the CCP for poor food practices. Instead of saying “we disagree with the judgement” they licked the boot and said they look forward working with the government to resolve the situation. Point is, corporations should be afraid of the government, clearly Google is not afraid of the EU and as a result I expect similar behavior from them in the future.

Conway’s law strikes again!

Maybe I should say “critical of algorithms”. The point is it’s not engineered to "maximize engagement "

Put the AI critique aside for a moment. Many people on lemmy dont like algorithms managing their feed. There’s probably a big overlap between people who are pervasively sensitive to dark algorithms and people who perceive AI as a dark algorithm parlor trick .

Lossy compression with no internal mechanism for detecting information corruption.

And the execs that made thr decision to fire in the first place will be punished by giving them bonuses.

You can place bets on the death of democracy on polymarket but can’t place bets on the death of CEOs. Kind of makes you think 🤔

“yeah there’s a new giant structure and there’s a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there’s no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego”

IDK, cobol programmers still do well these days

The description that the LLM did it on its own is subjective at best. I’ll just leave it at that. Have a good one

It’s not “bested” by the LLM though, a mathematician used the LLM as a tool to disprove a conjecture. Subtract the mathematicians from the process and the LLM would not have successfully completed the task. It would be more accurate to say a mathematician with an LLM was able to best a mathematician who did not have an LLM. Which is cool, but we don’t need to pretend the LLM is not a tool but something that “understands” math like a mathematician

You are the one collapsing tool use into a binary when there are varying degrees of competency and hand holding.

So why are you allergic to people talking about the quality of the tools in regards to capability?

How are you able to understand it’s capability without understanding what tools it is capable of manipulating to effect?

If you are not interested in how it completes the task then you are not an authority on how it works.

It’s relevant to what the parent was saying about LLMs. The success of the LLM in using mathematical tools does not contradict what they were saying. To then accuse them of lying because of a misunderstanding is… bad form.

Aren’t you the least bit curious what tools they gave the LLM and how the LLM used those tools? It’s like back in math class you are asked to solve a quadratic formula but you forgot how. So you use the calculator to try different numbers and the calculator is telling you if you are getting closer. Sure I got the right answer, but it’s hardly a testament to my math skills.