- cross-posted to:
- usa@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- usa@lemmy.ml
You must log in or # to comment.
You can’t earn so much money just to expect the responsibility won’t catch up with you. This one is a social responsibility for the impact caused.
If he wanted a low profile, no risk job, he could always opt to not become an executive in the first place.
That’s why they get paid the money they get paid.
Time to get their money’s worth (?)
Keep track of his every move just so we know he isn’t breaking the law
Dude also has his house blurred out on Google Maps street view.
This is a thing? How many zeroes to your net worth do you have to be to obtain this opt, or is this readily available to the masses?
Fairly sure you can “opt out” from being shown if you live at an address and fill out some form. I think it’s available, but not exactly advertised or promoted as an option.
I’ve seen random neighborhoods where 1 or 2 houses will randomly be blurred out.
Someone needs to go take photos of his house and and post them.
*Livestream it
This dude is so screwed. I don’t think he even realizes yet.
Oh no, won’t somebody think of his privacy
Btw in a completely unrelated train of thought, have you guys seen the low low prices on poo flinging trebuchets?
It’s fun, easy, and highly educational to build your own!
Is fresh and steamy an upgrade? Or liquid?
I believe that you may be thinking of the newest development in the field of Advanced Manure Delivery: The Super Flamer 3000.
Think of the SF3000 as a holistically synergetic approach to fertilizizing and pesticide treatment. Combining well known ranged incendiary technology, with state of the art manure slurry dispensation technology, the SF3000 is applied as a pre-seeding treatment. By using the manure slurry as fuel, the SF3000 is able to reduce infestation of both insects and weeds in your fields, while staying biologically sustainable.
Look out for our TV commercials, we’ve spared no expense. We’ve got Aaron Paul to reprise his character Jesse Pinkman, in order to record our new slogan: “shits on fire yo!”
If the concept sounds appealing we also offer the SF4000x pro, which applies AI and vision technology, to target individual undesired plants with directed high speed streams of fire.
…
Ok that was actually pretty rewarding to write. I had the concept bouncing around for hours. But oh boy, imagine being killed with a pig piss fueled flamethrower, I’ve got several other ways of dieing that I’d prefer.
Lots of information about people is online.
…Does he have something to hide?
Its almost like privacy is a good thing.
Hope nothing bad happens to you. Surely not. Flock cameras make everything safer right?
May he have many eyes on him
I wanna see too
Under his eye? Or under our eye?
Our eye. For security purposes.
Does he feel unsafe? Just put up a Flock camera on your house, Garrett! So we can all be sure that you are as safe as a bug all snug in a rug.
Was about to say the same thing: aren’t Americans supposed to accept a trade-off between security and privacy? He’s a public figure, he should get total security with cameras everywhere around his house, and their feed should be public so that his security is crowd-managed!
Removed by mod
Does he now get to doxx you? Is that how it works?
No
This is a periodic reminder. I’m on mobile so I’m copying a previous comment.
Flock Safety is only the tip of the problem.
Some districts are de-Flocking only to install an Axon ALPR network service. Keep fighting until your community outlaws all ALPRs and ALPR lookups are inadmissable in court.
There are other technologies that are already in use and widely abused by law enforcement such as IMSI catchers, geofence warrants and Drones as First Responder. Learn what your district allows and be a civil nuisance untill that shit is blocked.
Judges have long ceased tightly constraining judicial warrants, and most courts accept the good faith exception, so US and state courts cannot be trusted with any overreaching surveillance technology or forensic tools. This includes chromatic field drug tests and detection dogs.
He’s cool with stealing all of our data, and making us feel helpless about what others are doing with it, so I don’t see why he shouldn’t feel that same fear.
What’s the problem? I thought privacy was a small price to pay for “safety?”
Sounds like that Kirk guy on guns.
Now I’m waiting for Langley to cop a camera to the neck.
I just realized that the guy selling all of these surveillance cameras has the same name as the CIA headquarters. The writers of this reality are too damn lazy.
They may be closely or distantly related.
Maybe put up some cameras all around his house and social life and broadcast it while at it
He should just point a flock camera at his house. Then he’ll be 80% safer based on a study I just made up like the ones on their sales pitch.
Even better, a group should cut down several dozen of them and mount them all on poles outside his house during the night, so that he wakes up to them in the morning. No vandalism, no violence, no threats, just a blunt statement that the media couldn’t possibly ignore.
Heck, no need to even risk collecting that many real ones. I hear there’s some fairly decent 3D printed fakes available.
But what if we had a little violence and vandalism as a treat?
Then you provide the enemy with ammunition.
They claim that the purpose of the cameras is to prevent crime, and that the people who oppose them are violent extremists. They’ve even tried to label deflock.me as a terrorist organization.
Don’t provide the enemy with ammunition.
To be realistic, they don’t need ammunition. They just make it up anyways. It’s not about being civil and cordial anymore. Points have to be made.
“Not giving them ammunition” means getting ignored. We can’t afford to be ignored anymore. Shit is urgent. The Epstein class needs to be afraid or we wait until they build the technology and infrastructure that allows them to completely ignore our needs/demands forever.
Especially when the right is also mad about the tech. Strike while the iron is hot. Now is the time to act, not just have discussions. And I don’t mean violence, but let them know that card is on the table otherwise we the people will continue being ignored.
Always bothers me when people act like there is zero political violence. They are shooting us in the fucking street on film. Shits over.
Also your username is fuckin wild lol
You made me look at their username. I hate you.
That’s on you playa, curiosity killed the cat
I betcha if they set them up in his rich people neighborhood they wouldn‘t last for 2 days because someone with more money than him made a phone call.
He would be making that call. This rat roach fuck knows exactly what he is doing, do not give him an out.
I love this. They are solar powered so everything would work. All you need is a post hole digger to build a little flock forest.
Ooh, yes someone should do this not on any particular person’s property but as an avantgarde public art installation. Not with actual Flock cameras but just some replicas. Pop it up in a couple different cities around the world.
You are onto something. What if we just 3d print a bunch of fake cameras, wear a reflective vest, and install them in your nearby rich neighborhoods?
“Little brother is watching you!”
heads on spikes you say? i hope those models don’t look like billionaires…just kidding
a group should cut down several dozen of them
No vandalism
😐
E: LOL downvotes for facts, I guess
The vandalism was putting them up in the first place.
Technically not theft. Technically not vandalism.
“Vandalism refers to the intentional destruction or defacement of property”
They relocated the item to its owners house. At best the cutting might be vandalism but you don’t have to cut them down. That just happens to be quicker.
It is 100% vandalism, in every sense. I support it, civil disobedience and all that, but there’s no rationalizing it as anything else.
Nice downvote.
You didn’t look up the legal definition of anything before you posted this nonsense. Have a good day.
Nonsense? You just posted a definition that describes this activity exactly…? So if anyone is posting nonsense, its you.
When the law doesn’t follow the law, laws are irrelevant.
No. I did not. Relocation of the asset to the owners property means there’s no intent to deprive the owner of said property which means that it’s not theft.
The property has not been defaced, damaged, or destroyed so that means there’s no intent of vandalism. Therefore vandalism did not take place.
What you’re describing is criminal mischief, which I would agree this is.
I made a singular allowance in the case that the pole was cut (which counts as damage), rather than being dug up (which wouldn’t), which you appear to have ignored.
If you don’t like facts, that is a you problem.
You are welcome to kagi or whatever this yourself to see what I’m talking about instead of doubling down.
If you are incapable of that, don’t bother to respond to me.
Vandalism as a public service
Heck, no need to even risk collecting that many real ones. I hear there’s some fairly decent 3D printed fakes available.
Would be a shame if someone created a network of cameras tracking his every move and posted it online for free in real time. Nothing illegal about that, right? No implicit threat in that, right?
