• Zanacross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you need to go to the city you drive your car and then when you’re on the outskirts you can get a bus or a train in?

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I did not said that.
      My “people who don’t live in cities” means “for people who don’t live in the city and don’t need to go in the city”, not everyone need a city in their lives.

      And in this case, train and bus are not an option for most of the times.

      • Zanacross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nobody is saying you can’t have a car as a person not living in a city, we are talking about how cities don’t need to be filled with cars if cities were filled with decent public infrastructure.

        And if you don’t live in a city and don’t plan on going to a city why does it even concern you if cars get banned from cities?

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And if you don’t live in a city and don’t plan on going to a city why does it even concern you if cars get banned from cities?

          Because mayor cities are not an entity that live in a isolated system.
          I may not need to go to the city every day, but maybe I need to go every now and then. If you ban cars in a city, I am hit too the moment I could need to go to the city for whatever reason (parents, medics, whatever)

          What they are usually doing though, it is not banning the cars from the cities but simply banning the car from outside entering the city, without improving the public transportation system (sometimes making it worse).