cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/27733087

Social networking startup and X competitor Bluesky is working on subscriptions. The company first announced plans to develop a new revenue stream based on the subscription model when detailing its $15 million Series A back in October. Now, mockups teasing the upcoming Bluesky subscription, along with a list of possible features, have been published to Bluesky’s GitHub.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ads and monetization have ruined the internet compared to what it was. Early Internet was completely without ads, and things were run by people who were actually interested in the content presented, not in profits.
    I have donated a couple of times to Lemmy.world, because servers and work is needed for it to work. But I refuse to accept any ads anywhere. Ads do NOT improve content IMO, it merely concentrates content with commercial sites.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There is no larger site the internet wouldn’t be better without.
        Google, Meta, Twitter, Youtube are all part of the monetization disease.
        The internet scaled on the back of subscribers, not big monetization, which frankly suck performance with tracking and ads rather than adding to it.
        We are on Lemmy, and lemmy would obviously work even better without competition from big monetized platforms.
        Communities doing passion projects serve the project. Without youtube we could have alternatives that worked better, because Youtube wouldn’t be there to attract all the attention.

        Back in the day we had indexing sites, fora, and also search before google. All things that helped finding interesting sites. The interesting sites of passion projects have become rare. And almost the entire internet is now driven for profit instead of interest and passion. I tell you, I can really see the difference, there is 100 times more irrelevant noise for the same amount of content.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            If you want social media, no matter if it’s Lemmy or Reddit, it costs a hell of a lot of money to host that.

            Seems to be doing fine, if scaled up cost and contributions would even out. IMO you actually proved my point.
            The scale of the internet is mainly based on ISP’s and those are paid by users. Sites can be distributed, the technology to do that has existed since the mid 90’s.
            These distribution models work fine, and do not have to deal with the added tasks of ads and trackers commercial sites use.
            You could pretty easily build a youtube like site around it.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                So of course, they’re going to be more likely to donate. Once you scale outside of those groups into groups of people who don’t care as much, and are less invested in the technology, you get less donations.

                This is true with how things are now, but an ad free internet would look very different, and users would behave differently and have different expectations.
                Note that I’m not arguing for a total non commercial Internet, things like subscriptions and Steam are fine, it’s things like Google Meta Twitter and the likes, where the users are actually the product, and the customers are the advertisers.

                PeerTube exists if you’re interested, by the way.

                Yes I know, but youtube makes it irrelevant, because everybody post there.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s distinction between targeted ads and community ads.

      Mainstream internet is bad for targeted ads and for-profit site that plaster ads as maximum as possible.

      Fediverse instance like Misskey.io runs ads, but all of them community ads. Letting their community promote their indie games, manga serialization, artbook release, online event gathering, etc.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ads and monetization have ruined the internet compared to what it was. Early Internet was completely without ads, and things were run by people who were actually interested in the content presented, not in profits.

      How early are we talking here? If you mean pre-Web, in the Usenet era it was standard practice to pay a subscription to join a Usenet server. If you mean the early Web, ads were already everywhere by the mid-90s.