Tech manufacturers continue misleading consumers with impressive-sounding but less useful specs like milliamp-hours and megahertz, while hiding the one measurement that matters most: watts. The Verge argues that the watt provides the clearest picture of a device’s true capabilities by showing how much power courses through chips and how quickly batteries drain. With elementary math, consumers could easily calculate battery life by dividing watt-hours by power consumption. The Verge:

The Steam Deck gaming handheld is my go-to example of how handy watts can be. With a 15-watt maximum processor wattage and up to 9 watts of overhead for other components, a strenuous game drains its 49Wh battery in roughly two hours flat. My eight-year-old can do that math: 15 plus 9 is 24, and 24 times 2 is 48. You can fit two hour-long 24-watt sessions into 48Wh, and because you have 49Wh, you’re almost sure to get it.

With the least strenuous games, I’ll sometimes see my Steam Deck draining the battery at a speed of just 6 watts – which means I can get eight hours of gameplay because 6 watts times 8 hours is 48Wh, with 1Wh remaining in the 49Wh battery.

Unlike megahertz, wattage also indicates sustained performance capability, revealing whether a processor can maintain high speeds or will throttle due to thermal constraints. Watts is also already familiar to consumers through light bulbs and power bills, but manufacturers persist with less transparent metrics that make direct comparisons difficult.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This shits driven me nuts for years. Rechargeable flashlights rated in milliamp-hours?? What the fuck is that? Like they said, it’s marketing bullshit so you get tricked into buying something that sucks.

    But GOD FORBID WE REGULATE ANYTHING RIGHT??

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lead-acid battery OEMs are also allowed to market Ah on batteries with a 50% DoD…

      Lots of people don’t realize lithium is actually cheaper because of this

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I guess they could still lie about watt-hours, but buying anything based off of the reported mAh capacity is a crapshoot.

      Ended up with a clearly fake 18650 in my collection. Weighs way less than an older 2200 mAh one but it’s label says 9900 mAh. Again, it’s an 18650.

      The culprit:

          • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            The one that tempts me is preying on SovCits. They’re such suckers, you could milk so much money off them and fuck em, right?

            But nooooo I have to have a legitimate career…

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I may be re-thinking my morals for things like that here soon. My legitimate career relies heavily on federal grant money, and my skills aren’t rare enough to hope France will adopt me. Maybe I’ll start a meme coin or something lol.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Any 18650 with a rated capacity of more than 4Ah is a fake. They will usually be very low capacity. The low weight and the hollow sound when you tap on it is good indicator of that too.

        There are a number of reputable sites for buying 18650 cells. Stay away from Amazon and Aliexpress, they are full of fakes.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess they could still lie about watt-hours

        Your battery illustrates that; 9.9Ah * 3.7V is, indeed 36.63Wh. Buying anything without trust in the seller or verification by a third party is a crapshoot.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s true, but this one came from a known (local) vendor. I took it back, and they were happy to refund it. Since they were gonna toss it, I asked if I could keep it (it works well enough to power an ESP32).

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d be a little concerned about safety. A manufacturer or distributor that’s willing to lie so blatantly about capacity might also be willing to sell cells that failed QC.

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yep. It’s for an outdoor weather node on a metal pole, so damage would be fairly minimal if it had a bad day. It’s also only charging at like 200 mAh (max) since it’s got only a small 1W solar panel hooked to the charge controller. The only other concern would be summertime temperature, but I worry about that regardless of the cell.