they will save 188,000 € on Microsoft license fees per year

  • MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m guessing it’s a really small state with not much IT going on.

    As for cheaper to give for free: ABSOLUTELY. But, with free then they don’t have their sales guys in there talking with them, they don’t have the state “acknowledging the debt” and the legitimacy of their right to charge for their software.

    In the 1990s M$ let the world pirate DOS and Windows with wild abandon, they were just happy that people were using their stuff and not others’. After the world was good and hooked, shortly after we all survived Y2K, they started turning the screws - requiring license keys for full functionality, getting serious about demanding payment.

    Bill Gates net worth was “only” $30B before they got serious about charging for their software, today I see it’s over $200B even after all of Melinda’s philanthropy.

    • exchange12rocks@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m guessing it’s a really small state with not much IT going on.

      A small organization will have higher software license prices per user than a large one.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Also true, and at this kind of rate we can assume the state is doing most of its own IT self-support without a lot of M$ hand-holding.