Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square185fedilinkarrow-up1766arrow-down117cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1749arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square185fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoYes, but the test code “writes itself” - the path is clear, you just have to fill in the blanks. Writing the proper product code in the first place, that’s the valuable challenge.
minus-squarezbyte64@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 minutes agoMaybe it is because I started out in QA, but I have to strongly disagree. You should assume the code doesn’t work until proven otherwise, AI or not.
Yes, but the test code “writes itself” - the path is clear, you just have to fill in the blanks.
Writing the proper product code in the first place, that’s the valuable challenge.
Maybe it is because I started out in QA, but I have to strongly disagree. You should assume the code doesn’t work until proven otherwise, AI or not.