Red meat has a huge carbon footprint because cattle requires a large amount of land and water.

https://sph.tulane.edu/climate-and-food-environmental-impact-beef-consumption

Demand for steaks and burgers is the primary driver of Deforestation:

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-beef-industry-fueling-amazon-rainforest-destruction-deforestation/

https://e360.yale.edu/features/marcel-gomes-interview

https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2023-06-02/almost-a-billion-trees-felled-to-feed-appetite-for-brazilian-beef

If you don’t have a car and rarely eat red meat, you are doing GREAT 🙌 🙌

Sure, you can drink tap water instead of plastic water. You can switch to Tea. You can travel by train. You can use Linux instead of Windows AI’s crap. Those are great ideas. But don’t drive yourself crazy. If you are only an ordinary citizen, remember that perfect is the enemy of good.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sure, but like ~8 companies produce like 75% of the pollution. Their biggest con was shifting the responsibility to individuals to change their habits instead of forcing them to clean up their factories

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 minutes ago

    so how many burgers do I skip to compensate for one of Musk’s jet joy rides?

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I get that individuals aren’t the problem impact wise but couldn’t it be the case that if the majority of people life a more sustainable life it will be easier to create laws that put stop the real poluters bc people are in support of such regulations?! If the majority of people think the existence of billionaires is immoral, it will be easier to tax the rich…

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I thought it was overthrowing oppressive world governments and holding environmentally-damaging businesses accountable for their actions, hm.

    When populations are starving to death in 2044, pat yourself on the back for not eating red meat.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Cute.
    I’d be more interested in adding private and commercial airliners, long-haul trucks and tanker ships to the list for comparison.

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How much less red meat to offset all the private jet that flew to Venice for bezos’ wedding?

  • Kiwi_fella@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I have a motorbike I use infrequently, I eat red meat rarely, and I have no children. I feel like I’m doing my part.

  • catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    YSK this is BS. You ain’t gonna stop corporate-created climate issues by eating one or two fewer cows. In fact, nothing you can do, will.

  • vivalapivo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s never about personal responsibility. You can smug about not eating red meat, driving electric or not having children, but it doesn’t change the reality: the climate is changing.